Since it was first announced, the Fantastic Four reboot has been getting quite the bit of negative press even before a single official still has been released. We've seen leaked behind the scenes photos, heard about reshoots and other production problems (, and heard of reveals about new character origins (Dr. Doom is an angry blogger....it feels weird typing that sentence). But we've never seen first look at any of the footage shown.....until now.
Today, Fox and Marvel finally dropped the first look at the new reboot, and it looks very different compared to what we have seen before from Marvel's First Family. Check it out below!
This trailer gives me a lot of mixed emotions to it. On the one hand, this already looks loads better than the two Tim Story directed films we received in 2005 and 2007. I appreciate that we are going in a much more serious tone compared to the last two films, and definitely focusing on more of the science and cosmic side rather than just straight up comedic elements. I'm also really interested in a lot of what the story will be, and just to see what variations will be made from their origins (already we seem to be going to other dimensions rather than just outright space).
Also, the film looks beautiful. The cinematography is drop dead gorgeous and just really pretty to look at. Director Josh Trank, who made the incredibly underrated found footage film Chronicle, directs this film beautifully and I'm greatly curious to see how the rest of the film plays out.
My one big gripe, however, while I appreciate the tone being darker compared to previous films, it almost feels a bit too serious. I understand this is only a teaser so far so I'm hoping the final product is a nice blend between dark and playful. Again, I understand this is only the first look and the film isn't out in a little under 6 months so I shouldn't judge yet, but I'm hoping for a bit more....lightheartedness is the right word will be shown.
But this teaser did exactly what it's supposed to do: it teased me. I like how we see glimpses of the team's powers, such as with the Human Torch and the Thing, but never the full reveal. No sign of Doctor Doom yet, except perhaps near the very end of the trailer we hear him talking to Mr. Fantastic (Miles Teller). I do not believe him to be the voiceover in the trailer, as I think it could be Dr. Storm (Reg E. Cathey), Sue and Johnny's father. Now that I've seen footage, consider my interest piqued for what will happen in the next six months.
Catch Fantastic 4 when it opens in theaters on August 8.
So what about you, fellow movie goers? Are you excited for the Fantastic 4 reboot now that the film finally has some footage to show? Or are you still hesitant? Sound off in the comments below. And if you're a fan of films like I am, follow me @filmfan108! (Ha, see what I did there?)
I understand how strange this might be: I am a grown, 22 year old man who is sitting down to review a film involving an adorable bear wearing a red hat and a rain coat. But the thing is, I remember growing up reading Paddington. I live in America and Paddington obviously is much more of a literary icon in the UK. However, I remember reading or having the books read to me as a young child and I remember being charmed by the bear's personality and his tales. It's why I was rather looking forward to his first big screen adventure.
Paddington focuses on the bear's first arrival to London from the jungles of darkest Peru. After being sent to live there by his aunt and uncle (Imuelda Stanton and Michael Gambon), Paddington runs across the Brown family, headed by over worried and neurotic patriarch Henry (Hugh Bonneville). Seeing as how Paddington has no place to go, the Browns offer to let him stay with them until he can find the explorer who discovered his aunt and uncle many years ago. During this time, Paddington gets himself into quite a few hijinks along the way, including dealing with a crazed taxidermist (Nicole Kidman) who wishes to stuff Paddington as he is a rare breed. However, he also breathes life into the droll Brown family, giving them a new take on life (and a newfound obsession with marmalade).
Now, as most know, films involving talking animals you love or even based on beloved literary classics usually take the characters you know or love....and update them with a modern output (see: them using modern slang, rapping, etc). However, what director Paul King does with Paddington is still retain the book series' charm, but just have the setting be placed in modern times. The result is an old fashioned, charming, and absolutely enjoyable family adventure that brought back the feeling of how I felt watching family films in my youth.
The cast is absolutely pitch perfect. Hugh Bonneville, of Downton Abbey fame, is perfect as the flustered Mr. Brown. He perfectly captures the character from the books but also gives him his own moral conflict: should he let loose or should he still keep his calm sensibilities? The rest of Brown's family are excellent as well, especially Sally Hawkins as the wonderfully weird Mrs. Brown and Julie Walters as the kooky and hilarious Mrs. Bird, who, along with Peter Capaldi, delivers some of the best lines in the film.
As Mr. Brown's slightly crazy neighbor Mr. Curry, Peter Capaldi (yes, The Doctor) gives some of the best lines in the film. His character just lets loose and chews so much scenery in every take, as he has a strange hatred of bears in the city. He's not alone though, as Nicole Kidman steals every scene that she's in. Kidman hasn't been in a lot of great movies as of late so leave it to a film about an adorable bear to allow her to have one of the most fun performances I've seen in a while. Kidman's performances reminds me very much of Glenn Close in the live action remake of 101 Dalmatians. Both actresses play over the top evil people and they just let loose and look to be having a ton of fun, especially Kidman in this film.
But of course there's the real star of the film: Ben Whishaw as the voice of Paddington. Originally, Colin Firth was due to voice the titular bear, but dropped out of the performance months after the film was shot and after he had done the voiceover work. He cited the reasoning being that he felt that his deeper voice did not fit the innocence of the character. When you watch the final product and hear Whishaw instead of Firth, it's hard to imagine how Firth would have sounded. Whishaw brings a certain youthful innocence that fits the character's personality. Paddington genuinely is curious about the world around him, and Whishaw captures that perfectly. The voice feels pure, full of childlike curiosity.
(Also, look out for a special cameo from the creator of Paddington, Michael Bond).
One thing I must commend the film on is the production design as well the cinematography. The film has a design that looks straight out of a Wes Anderson film. Every single piece of background is created with intricate and exquisite detail. I spent most scenes of the film (particularly in moments where the Brown house looks like the inside of a dollhouse that detailed what the characters were doing), just trying to get a look at what details and objects were put within the film. It's truly remarkable how great the film looks, as you'll want to spend hours looking at the details.
Finally, what makes Paddington work so well besides the well rounded cast is the script, written by director Paul King and Hamish McColl. The script elevates the film, as it feels an old fashioned family adventure. In fact, while I was sitting in the theater watching the film, I could not help but have old feelings stir inside me, feelings not felt since I was young. Watching Paddington, I was reminded of the great family films I watched in my youth. I felt excited, scared, happy, sad, and a whole bunch of emotions I had not felt in a children's film in quite a long time. It excites me that there are family films still out there that DON'T have to rely on modern slang, that DON'T need tasteless jokes in order to progress or pad the story. It puts a smile to my face as I see that the next generation of children will have films that may invoke that same feeling.
Paddington is a delightful family adventure that everyone old and young can enjoy. It's quirky, charming, exciting, sad, and thrilling all at once. Young children and their families will enjoy this film, and perhaps it means that there is hope for great children's films.
GRADE: A
So how about you? Have you seen Paddington? Were you a fan of the books when you were younger, if you read them at all? If so, sound off in the comments below! And, as always, follow me on Twitter @filmfan108!
The nominations for the 87th annual Academy Awards were just announced and to say that it was a surprise to watch is an understatement. Many surprise snubs were abound this year, and many surprise nominations happened as well. Birdman and The Grand Budapest Hotel tie for the most nominations, with nine each. I'll be putting the full list of the other nominees down below, but let's starting talking about the big nominees now, starting with Best Animated Feature.
(Note: All of my predictions on who will win will be highlighted in green.)
Best Animated Feature Big Hero 6 The Boxtrolls How to Train Your Dragon 2 Song of the Sea The Tale of the Princess Kayuga
Well that was quick. Already out the gate and we have our first major snub on our hands. How was The LEGO Movie not nominated for this category? The film was a thoughtful, heartwarming tale that involved LEGO Construction Toys and the animation was nothing short of amazing. Everyone I know who had made predictions put this not only as the favorite to get nominated, but to win as well. Now that this film got criminally snubbed, How to Train Your Dragon 2 seems like the surefire winner, as that film was a wonderful animated film that raised the stakes while also expanding its world built in the first one. Best Original Screenplay Boyhood Birdman Foxcatcher The Grand Budapest Hotel Nightcrawler
This category I was pleasantly surprised by, as all the nominees are strong contenders. Nightcrawler was the biggest surprise, as I thought it was one of last year's most criminally underrated films. The script is crackling with so much energy and wit, which is backed by a strong turn by Jake Gyllenhaall, that it deserves to be nominated. I was also sadly disappointed that Selma did not receive a nomination in this category, as it was an absolutely powerful script filled with emotion and inspiration.
However, my pick for this category has to be The Grand Budapest Hotel. The script for that film was so delightfully charming and quirky, and having such an original idea on a classic genre (screwball capers), that it must be praised for its unique and fresh take. The dialogue is so fast and witty that it garners some big laughs out of the crowd watching it. The film leaves you feeling rather happy and content, and leaves on a poignant note rather than a sad one. It's one of the more unique scripts in recent memory.
Best Adapted Screenplay American Sniper The Imitation Game Inherent Vice The Theory of Everything Whiplash
As I am one person, I am not able to see every Oscar nominated movie. I try to, but prior commitments stand in my way (Theory of Everything and Imitation Game will be seen this week). I have seen American Sniper and while that was an rather amazing story with Chris Kyle's life. I also thought that Inherent Vice was not only a rather entertaining and hilarious script, but it was filled with a lot of good twists as well. While I would like Inherent Vice to win the award, I have a gut feeling that Whiplash will take home the top prize that night, as the film's script is said to be the odds on favorite due to its intensity and powerhouse performances. Best Supporting Actress Patricia Arquette-Boyhood Laura Dern-Wild Keira Knightley-The Imitation Game Emma Stone-Birdman Meryl Streep-Into The Woods
This is a tough category, as all of the actresses are equally fantastic in their performances. However, I believe that Patricia Arquette will go home with the Oscar. Her performance as Mason's mother felt so....natural. It didn't feel like you were watching an actor perform. You were watching a person take care of her children, which is an amazing feat. On the other nominees, I am pleasantly surprised to see Emma Stone up here for Birdman, as I thought her performance was rather excellent as Riggan's bitter daughter. If she won, I would have no qualms with it. Meryl Streep though....honestly, I'm surprised to see her on here. I would have thought that Carmen Ejogo would have scored the nomination.
Best Supporting Actor Robert Duvall-The Judge Ethan Hawke-Boyhood Edward Norton-Birdman Mark Ruffalo-Foxcatcher J.K. Simmons-Whiplash
There's no doubt about this one: Simmons will walk home with the statue come Oscar night. His intense, supposedly almost downright scary performance as the perfectionist music teacher is earning him the best raves of his career. I'm ecstatic that Duvall got a nomination, as he was absolutely fantastic in what ended up being yet another criminally underrated film from 2014. If he ends up being the dark horse in this race, I would have no qualms with it. I'm also glad to see Ruffalo and Norton get some love, as they were each great in their respective performances, especially Norton, who basically satirized every Method actor out there. But something tells me Simmons is going home with the Oscar.
Best Actress Marion Cotillard-Two Days, One Night Julianne Moore-Simply Alice Felicity Jones-The Theory of Everything Rosamund Pike-Gone Girl Reese Witherspoon-Wild
I am genuinely pleased that Pike got a nomination for her turn in Gone Girl, as her performance was all kinds of creepy and terrifying. I hope she picks up the trophy on that Sunday, but Felicity Jones might come in and become the favorite to win the award. On the side of the other nominees, I'm happy that Marion Cotillard got an award. Even though I had currently never heard of the film she was in until yesterday, but she is a wonderful actress and I'm glad she was nominated. The dark horse of the race? Julianne Moore, who is earning raves for her performance in Still Alice as the titular character diagnosed with Alzheimer's. She may swoop in and win the Oscar.
Best Actor Michael Keaton-Birdman Steve Carell-Foxcatcher Benedict Cumberbatch-The Imitation Game Eddie Reymayne-The Theory of Everything Bradley Cooper-American Sniper
Keaton has this one locked. As Riggan Thomson, he greatly pulls on his own life experience in the past to play this character and the result is one of the most honest and bitter performances I have ever seen. Keaton commands every second of the screen, making many parallels to when he was Batman. He's the sure fire favorite to win and my pick easily. I also would not be surprised if Eddie Reymayne came in and won for his accurate portrayal of Stephen Hawking, which has been getting raves and even nabbed him a Golden Globe. I am also VERY pleased to see Steve Carell on here, as his performance as John du Pont was creepy and rather reffective. I am massively disappointed in the noticeable and extreme lack of diversity within this race, however, as David Oyelowo was criminally snubbed for his amazing performance as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He deserved to be nominated and it's a shame that he was snubbed, as he deserved to join these actors.
Best Director Wes Anderson-The Grand Budapest Hotel Richard Linklater-Boyhood Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu-Birdman Bennett Miller-Foxcatcher Morten Tyldum- The Imitation Game
This one comes down to one of three choices: Anderson, Linklater, and Inarritu. My choice is Linklater because it is an amazing feat to see a film with an ambitious scope go off without a single hitch. However, Inarritu and Anderson both created unique and interesting stories that are sure to be remembered: one is about the price of fame and what it takes to reclaim it, the other is a bizarre and rather quirky take on comedy capers from the 50s or 60s. All three of these directors could take home the prize come Oscar night. However, it saddens me that another name I was hoping to be nominated was snubbed: Ava DuVernay for Selma. She crafted a powerful story that is important as well as relevant to our world today. It's a shame that she was also snubbed, as she deserved a nomination.
Best Picture American Sniper Birdman Boyhood The Grand Budapest Hotel The Imitation Game Selma The Theory of Everything Whiplash
This is a great list of nominees for Best Picture this year, and it's extremely hard to choose which will be the one to go home with the big prize. Will it be the story about the hotel concierge and his lobby boy on a madcap caper? Perhaps it's the story about the drummer pushed to his limits? Or maybe it'll be a biopic, maybe about one of the most ingenious minds in our lifetime, or about the man who inspired millions of African-Americans to have the most basic American rights. For me, the choice for who I think will win Best Picture will be the film that took 12 years to complete. Boyhood is an astounding film not just for the gimmick that it took 12 years to make (though it certainly helps), not just because it's a heartwarming coming of age tale, but because there are moments which everyone can relate to and it defies traditional filmmaking. Some people, at various points in their life, have had to deal with an abusive stepfather. Others have dealt with getting a bad hair cut. Others will remember their first love and how they handled it. Whatever the reason, Boyhood features moments that everyone can relate to. In addition, the film defies conventional filmmaking, as Richard Linklater makes a film that has little narrative structure and displays originality in its presentation. It is for these reasons that Boyhood is my pick for Best Picture.
THE REST OF THE NOMINEES! Best Foreign Language Film Ida (Poland) Leviathan (Russia) Tangerines (Estonia) Timbuktu (Mauritania) Wild Tales (Argentina) Best Documentary-Feature Citizenfour Finding Vivian Maier Last Days in Vietnam The Salt of the Earth Virunga Best Documentary -Short Subject Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1 Joanna Our Curse The Reaper (La Parka) White Earth Best Live-Action Short Film Aya Boogaloo and Graham Butter Lamp (La Lampe au beurre de yak) Parvaneh The Phone Call Best Animated Short Film The Bigger Picture The Dam Keeper FeastMe and My Moulton A Single Life Best Original Score The Grand Budapest Hotel- Alexandre Desplat The Imitation Game-Alexandre Desplat Interstellar-Hans Zimmer Mr. Turner-Gary Yershon The Theory of Everything-Johann Johnsson Best Original Song
"Everything is Awesome!!"- from The Lego Movie- Tegan and Sara ft. The Lonely Island
"Glory"- from Selma-John Legend ft. Common
"Grateful"- from Beyond the Lights-Rita Ora
"I'm Not Gonna Miss You- from Glen Campbell: I'll Be Me-Glen Campbell
"Lost Stars"-from Begin Again-Adam Levine Best Sound Editing American Sniper Birdman The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies Interstellar Unbroken Best Sound Mixing American Sniper Birdman Interstellar Unbroken Whiplash
Best Production Design The Grand Budapest Hotel The Imitation Game Interstellar Into the Woods Mr. Turner
Best Cinematography Birdman-Emanuel Lubezki The Grand Budapest Hotel-Robert Yeoman Ida-Lukasz Zal and Ryzard Lenczewski Mr. Turner- Dick Pope (or is it Dick Poop?) Unbroken-Roger Deakins
Best Makeup and Hairstyling Foxcatcher The Grand Budapest Hotel Guardians of the Galaxy
Best Costume Design The Grand Budapest Hotel Inherent Vice Into the Woods Maleficent Mr. Turner
Best Film Editing American Sniper Boyhood The Grand Budapest Hotel The Imitation Game Whiplash
Best Visual Effects Captain America: The Winter Soldier Dawn of the Planet of the Apes Guardians of the Galaxy Interstellar X-Men: Days of Future Past
So what say you fellow film lovers? Any other snubs that you were disappointed by? Any films you were happy to see nominated? Sound off in the comments below! I'll be live tweeting reactions to some of the bigger awards shows on Twitter (the Razzies, the SAG Awards, and of course, the Oscars) so follow me @filmfan108! I, for one, can't wait to see what will happen when the Oscar Telecast airs February 22 on ABC!
Paul Thomas Anderson has had a extremely varied career. From a story about porn stars to making Adam Sandler actually act to a tale involving greed, corruption, and oil, and finally, to a thinly veiled allegory about Scientology, the stories that PTA tells are definitely unique and varied. Now comes his latest film, an adaptation of the Thomas Pynchon neo-noir detective caper Inherent Vice.
Inherent Vice takes place in 1970s Los Angeles, where drug fueled Larry "Doc" Sportello (Joaquin Phoenix) begins to investigate the disappearance of real estate mogul Michael Wolfmann (Eric Roberts) and Shasta Hepworth (Katherine Waterson), Wolfmann's mistress and Doc's former girlfriend. His mystery leads into running him with the LAPD, specifically Lt. Det. Christian "Bigfoot" Bjornsen (Josh Brolin), who clashes with Sportello at almost every turn, dentists, prostitutes, and a whole other host of problems, problems that I would rather not spoil so that you may see the movie.
Having never read the Thomas Pynchon novel, I was excited for this as this looked to be much more light hearted compared to PTA's previous features, plus he had assembled one amazing ensemble cast of actors. I also went into this film blind, having only seen the first trailer maybe once, but remembering it left a big impression on me.
After seeing the film, Inherent Vice is a very enjoyable film, one that leaves good vibes with you throughout, although the film's structure will become polarizing to some.
The cast is absolutely spot on here. It's amazing how many people PTA assembles for his films, and this is no exception. As our protagonist Doc, Phoenix is perhaps at its most zaniest, as he stumbles around the film gleefully looking like he's having the time of his life. Doc is brilliant as a PI, but is always hazy about facts, due to being high almost all the time. Phoenix has always been a unique actor, going from stoic and serious in one film to zany at the brink of the hat. Phoenix is a joy to watch in this role.
Phoenix is backed by an incredibly strong supporting cast, particularly Owen Wilson, Katherine Waterson, Reese Witherspoon as the no nonsense DA, Benicio Del Toro, and a bunch of other surprises I do not dare to spoil. Finding out who is in the film is one of the more enjoyable parts, as the surprises come at every corner. The supporting cast is entertaining, there is no weak link in the bunch.
However, the big standout is Josh Brolin as "Bigfoot." Every time he comes on screen, Brolin had me rolling in my seat. He essentially plays the straight laced, comedically stoic detective that most would find in noir films. Bigfoot feels like a parody of those type of hard boiled, morally compromised protagonists seen within those type of films. Brolin plays this to great effect, taking normally serious moments and managing to elicit a strong laugh out of the audience (at least in mine and with the friends I saw the film with).
That's what PTA seems to have gone for in the film. It feels like a parody of noir films from the 50s, 60s, and yes, even the 70s. The use of lighting, the shots of the camera, as well as the script all feel very tongue in cheek with the genre of film noir. The script itself is downright hilarious, as it does have its moments where you know you shouldn't be laughing or moments that are blatantly immature but you can't help but grin.
Another strong point that the film delivers on is the soundtrack. Jonny Greenwood, once again teaming up with PTA, that feels reminiscent of old scores from the olden days of Hollywood. In addition to the score, the film is peppered with some amazing tracks from artists such as Neil Young, The Marketts, and Sam Cooke, among others. Next to the Guardians of the Galaxy soundtrack, this gets my vote for one of the best soundtracks from 2014.
However, the script is also where it might alienate a lot of filmgoers. The film features a very twisty and complicated narrative that may alienate some movie watchers, even becoming incoherent for some. If you are looking for a film with a simple structure, then this is not the film for you. Also, while the film does clock in at two and a half hours, it felt rather brisk, mainly due to the pace PTA sets throughout the film.
Inherent Vice is a film that definitely requires you to pay heavy attention and may seem incoherent to some, it's a very entertaining film to watch and one of PTA's best. Backed by a top notch cast, superb writing, and an excellent soundtrack, this film is sure to please any fans of PTA as well as those that are fans of watching a good detective story.
GRADE: A-
Have you see Inherent Vice? If so, what did you think or are you planning on seeing it? Sound off in the comments below! I'm also on Twitter, follow me @filmfan108!
Today's world is actually rather terrifying to live in. We see so many acts of racial violence happening in America, specifically in Ferguson after the Michael Brown case as well as the death of Eric Garner, who was wrongly killed in a chokehold by NY police officers. With so much racial tension happening throughout the country, one can not help but think back on the teachings and lessons of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and how he fought to have equal rights for all African-American people during the Civil Rights movement.
It's also why the film Selma could not have come at a more important and relevant time.
Selma depicts the 1965 voting rights marches from Selma, Alabama to the state's capital, Montgomery. The marches acted as a means to protest African-Americans not having the most basic American right: the right to vote. These marches were organized by Dr. Martin Luther King (David Oyelowo), James Bevel (Common), Hosea Williams (Wendell Pierce), and John Lewis (Stephan James). During the preparation of these marches, King must contend with the interference of Alabama governor George Wallace (Tim Roth), members of the Selma Police Department, townspeople of Selma, as well as the hesitation of President Lyndon B. Johnson (Tom Wilkinson).
While it was exciting to finally see a Martin Luther King Jr. film become fully realized on screen, I appreciated more the approach that was taken: showing a key, crucial moment in the Civil Rights movement and depict how Dr. Martin Luther King was involved with that event, rather than show a film depicting his entire life.
The result is one of the most powerful, moving, and inspiring films I have seen in quite a long time.
Everyone involved in this cast brings their absolute A-game in the film. David Oyelowo, in a career making performance, plays Dr. King not as this mythical, amazing figure that most of history seems to make him out to be, but as a man, one with weaknesses and flaws. Dr. King knows that the battle is uphill, and faces uncertainty about how events will proceed, especially with many innocent protesters getting beaten or lynched. His strained relationship with his wife Coretta due to his activities is also a bit of a highlight of the film. It brings Dr. King even more relatable as an individual. Oyelowo gives a powerful performance, capturing the mannerisms and quiet power that Dr. King radiates perfectly.
The supporting cast is excellent as well. Carmen Ejogo is great as Coretta King, portraying that doubt that her husband might be killed, but still faithful to him and his cause regardless. The rest of King's close followers, which includes actors such as Common, Pierce, Ruben Santiago-Hudson, and Oprah Winfrey, to name a few, are all excellent as well.
On the opposite side, the politicians, Tim Roth, as Wallace, is incredibly slimy, making you hate him the moment he walks onto the screen. Shame Roth isn't in as many movies any more, but when he is, he always manages to hold a great presence. Tom Wilkinson, as President Johnson, also does some fine work here, even if some of the facts presented about him may or may not not be entirely historically accurate. As a performance, Wilkinson is excellent, showing the doubt and conflict on whether he should help King or not and the pressure he faces. Whether or not the film is historically accurate or not, regardless, Wilkinson turned in an excellent performance
Director Ava DuVernay puts such great emotional tension into the film, especially in scenes that depict so much racial violence. The film pulls no punches whatsoever in terms of its content, and the result is startling. It's been a very long time since a film made me start to form tears in my eyes, but this one did it. DuVernay not only packs an emotional punch, but a tense one as well, as you are on the edge as to what will happen next. The film is incredibly well shot, as DuVernay makes some of the peaceful protest scenes look absolutely beautiful.
Many real-life parallels with current events will be evidently be made while watching the film, as the moments in protest, such as when all the protestors get down on the ground with their hands behind their head and only Dr. King and his companions are standing. Moments such as this not only raise many parallels with current events, but also raise a question: how would have Dr. King, had he still been alive, responded to the racial violence that is featured in the news today?
Overall, Selma is one of the most powerful, emotional, and important pieces of filmmaking that has come out in a long while. David Oyelowo and director Ava DuVernay give Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. the story that deserves to be told on screen while also coming at a not more relevant time. Every accolade upon the film is well justified and it'll be interesting to see what happens when the Oscar nominations are announced on Thursday.
GRADE: A+
Have you seen Selma? If not, are you looking forward to viewing it? Sound off in the comments below!
No one expected Taken to be as massive a hit as it was. The film, released in 2009, was a sleeper hit at the box office and reinvented Liam Neeson's career as an action star, leading to many films where Liam Neeson punches and kills quite a lot of people or things (see: Unbroken, The Grey, Non-Stop). In addition, due to Taken's massive success, two sequels were made: Taken 2, an unnecessary mess of a film that was essentially the same film as the first one, only this time he and his wife were taken, and this (supposedly) final installment, Taken 3 (or Tak3n, as it's stylized because....the kiddies will think it's cool).
In this latest installment, Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) is trying to live a normal life in L.A. with his daughter Kim (Maggie Grace) and ex-wife Lenore (Famke Jenssen), who is having marital problems with her current husband Stuart (Douguray Scott). One morning, Mills returns home to find Lenore's throat slashed in his room and the cops descending on his location instantly. It seems that Mills has been set up to look like he murdered his wife. Now, he must go on the run, evading Inspector Frank Dotzler (Forest Whitaker) while trying to keep his daughter Kim (Maggie Grace) safe from harm.
It still amazes me that this franchise is still going when it clearly should have ended at the first one. Taken 3 still doesn't improve much over the last film, as it is a brainless, idiotic action film that clearly show signs the franchise needs to end.
The only positive thing about the film is that Liam Neeson is still an absolute blast to watch. He still commands the screen whenever he shows up and, at the age of 62, he moves very well and handles all of his action scenes with ease.
However, the movie does not seem to realize this and instead decides to follow around Forest Whitaker and his merry band of misfits around for a solid 15-20 minutes. Let me rephrase that: Liam Neeson, the only reason to keep watching these movies, disappears for 15-20 minutes. When your biggest asset in your movie decides to disappear for 20 minutes and the movie decides to pad things for a while, there's a problem. While entertaining as he might be, even Neeson isn't enough to save this movie.
The rest of the supporting cast doesn't fare well either. Maggie Grace is literally given nothing to do other than worry about her dad and making sure he's OK, even though she's CLEARLY seen him take down bad guys with ease before, especially in the first movie when she was kidnapped. Dougray Scott, as Stuart, is also given very little to do until the final 25 minutes of the film.
On a technical level, the film fails miserably. The setting this time is in LA, not abroad in Europe. Due to being stateside, the film feels very cheaply made, as if everyone involved really didn't care at all about the making of the film. The script, written by Luc Besson and Robert Mark Kamen, who wrote the last two installments, is incredibly boring, as not much happens within the film until the final 30 minutes. It's mainly people walking around, finding Mills, and talking on cell phones. There's no tension behind any of what happens.
Director Oliver Megaton (Taken 2) furiously cuts and edits the film during the action scenes, which are among some of the worst editing I have seen in films. The editing moves so quickly and furiously that you can barely tell exactly what is going on. Not only that, but the editing essentially tries to tell us that we are watching a quick paced, exciting thriller, when in reality, all it ends up is one dragged out and overlong action thriller.
Overall, Taken 3 really proves why it's time for this franchise to die. Liam Neeson and Forest Whitaker try their best to rise above the film, but they're bogged down by bad dialogue, an incredibly boring script, and bad guys so generic you're going to forget them as soon as you leave the theater. The film proves that just because lightning struck once, doesn't mean it was going to happen again.
GRADE: F
Have you seen Taken 3? If not, do you plan to? Sound off with your thoughts on the film in the comments below!
Well, we've looked back at the past year for movies, the good and the bad. Now let us turn ahead to the future. 2015 has SO many good movies coming out that it was hard just to whittle it down to 15 alone. This is going to be a great year for films I can just tell. But let us not waste any more time, let's jump right into the 15 films I can not wait to see in 2015 (see what I did there?)
Now this list was perhaps the hardest list to create out of all the films on this list. If there is a film I may have missed on the list, I either did not think of it or did not warrant it for these 15 films. That does not mean I'm excited for it, these are the films that truly have my interest in the course of the year. Also, I will be adding a trailer to those that have one below after my thoughts on each film.
Finally, as always everyone, this is my own list. You are welcome to your own opinions, as film is subjective. All I ask is that you respect mine.
And now....
These are my top 15 most anticipated films of 2015. #15. In the Heart of the Sea (March 13)
Ron Howard has been making some eclectic and unique films in his career. First it was the adaption of Dan Brown's thrillers The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons, then it was 2013's vastly underappreciated Rush, and now he returns with this at-sea thriller. The film is based on the true story of the whaling ship the Essex, which, in 1820, is destroyed by a massive sperm whale, forcing the crew to be marooned for 90s days. The tale is also what inspired author Herman Melville to create his masterpiece, Moby Dick. The premise itself is intriguing alone. and the cast is rather excellent, with Chris Hemsworth teaming once more with Howard after a phenomenal turn in Rush. In addition, I'm extremely curious to see how Ron Howard handles a big sea disaster film, as we've seen very few good ones since The Perfect Storm. I'm enjoying the fact that Howard is moving into more darker, dramatic territory and hopefully In The Heart of the Sea will be able to continue that trend.
#14. Inside Out (June 14)
It's been quite a while since Pixar released a film hasn't it? 2014 saw nothing released from the animation giant, an unusual occurrence as there usually is a Pixar movie every year. Well, not only is Pixar back with two films this year, and this first one looks like an incredibly strong return to the original stories that made them household names in the first place. The idea is that young Riley is uprooted from her home and moves to San Francisco. Her emotions inside of her, including Joy, Fear, Anger, Disgust, and Sadness, try to help her adjust to her new life while also struggling with the change themselves. Not only is this such a unique and cool idea, but it's backed by a stellar voice cast: Amy Poehler, Bill Hader, Lewis Black, Mindy Kaling, Phyllis Smith, and Diane Lane to name a few. It's been quite a while since Pixar had a great movie on their hands, and I'm hoping that this (as well as the upcoming The Good Dinosaur) bring them back to that glory.
#13. Ant-Man (July 17)
Marvel, you never cease to amaze me. Originally, I was not going to put this film on here, as while I was looking forward to it, I also didn't have much interest in it. After all the behind the scenes drama with Edgar Wright leaving the project and then having Peyton Reed, the director of Bring it On and The Break-Up, you know, GREAT examples to direct a superhero film, I was skeptical if this would continue Marvel's winning streak, or start showing the real chinks in their armor. And then.....the teaser trailer debuted last night during Agent Carter. I am genuinely surprised by how great this looks, especially the design and use of the Ant-Man suit. The effects look great and the tone of the trailer completely me took me by surprise, as it's much more serious and dramatic than I was expecting. I think what the real winner about this whole trailer however is that we're focusing on the relationship between con man Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) and his young daughter, which in turn gives him a reason to become a hero and prove his worth. This is an idea not really explored in much superhero films, how being a hero can affect your family, and I like how Marvel is going with this angle. Marvel, I don't know how you did it, but you did the impossible: got me excited for this movie.
#12. Crimson Peak (October 16)
Very little has been known about Guillermo Del Toro's return to gothic horror, but from what I keep hearing from Comic Con and based off this first image, it's going to be a true return to classic horror. I love the cast involved, especially the involvement of Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain, and the design seems to mix gothic buildings with Del Toro's own style of creating worlds. All I know of the plot is that Mia Wasikowska's characters falls for and marries Tom Hiddleston's character, who turns out to not be all he appears to be. This seems like the first true horror film to come out in a long time, and based off this first picture of Chastain, I can hardly wait.
#11. The Revenant (December 25)
I am greatly curious in The Revenant. There hasn't been many Westerns out in the last few years, with the True Grit remake, Django Unchained, and yes, even A Million Ways to Die in the West among the bigger ones. However, the plot feels like a good old fashioned revenge story: When fur trapper Hugh Glass (Leonardo DiCaprio) gets mauled by a bear, his compatriots (Tom Hardy, Will Poulter, and Domhnall Gleeson) rob Glass and leave him for dead. Glass survives and sets out to take down the men who betrayed him. I'm hoping that this could be the role that finally gains Leo an Oscar win (hopefully). Not only that but this is the next film that director Alejandro González Iñárritu is making after coming off of his critically acclaimed Birdman. I can't wait until an official trailer for this film is finally released.
#10. The Peanuts Movie (November 6)
I absolutely love the Peanuts gang. Charles M. Schultz's cast of amazing characters has been a massive part of my childhood from day one and the annual holiday specials are traditional required viewing in my household. When I heard that they were making a CG movie, I was understandably nervous, as most classic things from childhood are updated with god-awful pop culture references, like twerking, characters rapping for no reason other than it's hip to the kiddies, and really, painstakingly obvious current jokes kids will get. Blessedly, producer Paul Feig has been working closely with Charles' son Bryan and grandson Craig in order to deliver a proper Peanuts movie- one without Snoopy or Charlie Brown rapping/twerking. This first trailer seems to deliver on that promise by celebrating what Peanuts, and in turn Schultz's vison is about: dreaming big and using your own imagination to be happy within life. This is my most anticipated animated film of the year, as when you watch the trailer, you'll feel like a child again, giddy at seeing so imaginative and creative.
#9. Jupiter Ascending (February 6)
Usually when a film gets pushed back from its original release date to next year, it's never a good sign. Jupiter Ascending was supposed to be out last July, but was pushed back to February due to needing more time to complete some 2,000 effects shots left. Honestly, I'm glad they took the time to finish things up, as this looks like one of the most original science fiction films to come out in a while. Alien royalty has been harvesting life on other planets in order to create a type of youth serum. Three siblings, one of them played by Eddie Reymayne, is at war over who gains their late mother's inheritance. They then find that there is an unknown heir: Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis), a house cleaner on Earth. Balem (Reymayne) immediately places a bounty on her head, causing warrior Caine Wise (Channing Tatum) to protect her. The Wachowskis are known for their big, grand stories (see The Matrix and Cloud Atlas for examples), and this looks like to be one of their biggest yet. I like the mix of gorgeous CGI worlds with the use of more practical effects (such as Caine's gravity shoes). It's very rare to see an original property not based off a comic or a book or a reboot or even a sequel, which makes Jupiter Ascending all the more enticing.
#8. Tomorrowland (May 22)
I can't wait to find out more about this movie. This movie is one of the biggest mysteries of the year, as plot details are kept are about as tight as a J.J. Abrams movie (well okay....this film hasn't invested in anti-drone technology like Abrams, but it's still kept pretty tight). The teaser trailer, shown at this past year's New York Comic Con, does exactly what a film of this magnitude is supposed to do: tease you, make you want to find out more about it. George Clooney, who usually never takes on these kinds of event blockbusters, looks like he'll be excellent as always, and I have faith in director Brad Bird, who has proven to excel greatly in animation with films like The Iron Giant and The Incredibles, and in live-action, such as the excellent Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol. I can't wait to find out what Bird and screenwriters Damon Lindelof and Jeff Jensen have planned.
##7. The Hateful Eight (November 16)
I was going to actually put this at #8....but then I realized that would have been an awful pun so moved it up one due to avoid incredible amounts of bad humor. So with a new Quentin Tarantino film out this year...there was no way I WASN'T going to put this in my top 10. I love Tarantino's work greatly, and I'm excited for him to return to the Western genre after Django Unchained. This film almost never came to be, as a script leak forced Tarantino to shut down production of the film. However, it seems he had a change of heart and is now releasing the movie this November. The plot follows eight people holed up in one location during a blizzard, who may not all make it out alive. Tarantino always assembles a stellar cast, and this is no exception: Kurt Russell, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Samuel L. Jackson, Michael Madsen, and Tim Roth are just some of the names listed in the cast and them mixed with Tarantino's excellent dialogue is simply a match made in heaven.
#6. Furious 7 (April 3)
How is it The Fast and the Furious films are some of the most entertaining films out there. We are now seven films in and this series shows no signs of slowing down whatsoever. This latest installment takes places after the events of the sixth, as Han has been murdered by Ian Shaw (Jason Statham), Owen Shaw's big brother. He wants revenge for what Dom and his crew did to his younger brother, and now Dom, Brian, and the rest of the gang must take down Ian to avenge one of their own. The film went through a bit of tragedy last year, as franchise star Paul Walker was killed in a fiery car crash. After figuring out what to do with the rest of the franchise as well as how to respectfully give Brian a proper send off, Universal and the rest of the Fast team have come up with a film that looks crazier than ever (cars jumping out of planes and parachuting down to the ground!) while also potentially setting up the series' endgame. James Wan, in his action feature debut, seems to have a handle on the action scenes and I'm just...really really excited to see both Dwayne Johnson AND Vin Diesel take on Jason Statham.
#5. Jurassic World (June 12)
Hard to believe, but it's been almost 13 years since we last saw the name "Jurassic Park" on our theater screens. In that time, the technology for computer generation has improved greatly and the original Jurassic Park still remains one of the most beloved films today. That's why it's a perfect time to reintroduce people to this world, with an idea so ingenious, it's the only next logical step for this franchise: the park actually works. The park, now called Jurassic World, has been open for 20 years and is thriving, being one of the world's most popular attractions. However, attendance numbers are down recently, so Bryce Dallas Howard's character, taking on the John Hammond role, comes up with a way to create a hybrid of two dinosaurs. Obviously, this is an absolutely terrible idea, and the dinosaur goes on a rampage, causing Chris Pratt's dinosaur expert to figure things out before it's too late. The film looks like it recaptures the spirit of the original film, as Colin Trevorrow has a clear love for it. The film feels not as if it's a cheap cash grab, but genuine: a film people actually want to see get made and care about the source material behind it. That and the image of a giant amphibian dinosaur eating a shark in a splash zone is a really cool image. Chris Pratt riding with velociraptors....well I'll wait until the film gives me more context.
#4. Mad Max: Fury Road (May 15)
After 30 long years, director George Miller returns to the original franchise based on speed: Mad Max. Set in between The Road Warrior and Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome, the film follows Max, now played by Tom Hardy, as he helps a woman, Furiosa (Charlize Theron), across the post apocalyptic desert. Naturally, some men, led by Nux (Nicholas Hoult), begin chasing them, and what follows looks like of the most ridiculous and insane car chases I've ever seen. The whole film, for its runtime, takes place mostly over one giant long car chase through the desert, which sounds like a great idea for an action movie. One continuous chase over the span of two hours sounds like a unique opportunity for some cool action set pieces. Hardy looks like he'll take Gibson's mantle just fine as Max and Hoult looks insane as Nux, leader of the group chasing the pair. What a lovely day indeed.
#3. Avengers: Age of Ultron (May 1)
The first Avengers, released way back in 2012, was the culmination of an experiment that brought so many famous superheroes together on the big screen. It was the payoff of a four year build up that no one was unsure if it would work or not. Now, three years after the first Avengers film, things are very different: all eyes are on Marvel, one of the most successful studios working at the moment, as they release the culmination in their "Phase Two." The sequel finds the team together once more, as they are dealing with the fallout from their own adventures. Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) decides to build Ultron (James Spader), a peacekeeping robot that can watch over and fix the troubles of the world while the Avengers are able to take a break. However, Ultron soon deems that mankind's worst enemy is itself, and soon begins to eradicate the entire human race. Now it's up to The Avengers to stop him, joined by Quicksilver (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Scarlett Witch (Elizabeth Olsen). The tone of this film looks much darker than last time, as the team looks to be in dire peril than dealing with the Chitauri. In addition, Spader, who does the motion capture and voice of Ultron, is incredibly creepy, giving just the right amount of menace for the character. Avengers: Age of Ultron looks to once again shake up the MCU and judging from the footage, it looks like they might succeed.
#2. Spectre (November 6)
Had it not been for a certain other film on this list, this probably would have been my number one pick, as everytime a James Bond film comes out, it feels like an event. You want to be there to see what will happen after all the hype and secrecy surrounding the production is unveiled. After the events of Skyfall, James Bond (Daniel Craig) uncovers a cryptic message from an unusual source that leads him to navigate the organization simply known as SPECTRE. He then uncovers a secret that could destroy everything he protects and loves. Just the fact that SPECTRE is finally back in the rebooted Craig series is enough to get me excited, but then we have the stellar new additions to the cast, including Christoph Waltz, Lea Seydoux, Monica Belluci, Dave Bautista, and Andrew Scott. We also get the return of Mr. White from Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, allowing for some connective tissue between all the Craig films so far. Also, I am greatly curious about Waltz's role, as he is playing Franz Oberhauser, a character from the original novels who was Bond's ski teacher as well as a type of father figure to Bond. However, I can't help but wonder if they made Oberhause the new Blofeld, the head of SPECTRE in the older films, for this new one. While Spectre is VERY high on my list for most anticipated films, it would have been number one if it was not for this next film.
I screamed louder than a girl at a One Direction concert when the Falcon showed up.
So what films are you looking forward to in 2015? Sound off in the comments below or follow me on Twitter @filmfan108! Here's to a great year for movies!
Well...we already covered the best films that came out this past 2014. Now it is time to look at the stinkers. These were the films that were either massive disappointments, or just absolute garbage. There are no honorable mentions unlike the last list (or would that be dishonorable?) so let's just get right into it.
Again, like in the last list, these are simply my opinions. Film is subjective and everyone has an opinion on films. All I ask is that you please respect my choices for this list.
These are the 10 films I thought were the worst in 2014.
#10. The Monuments Men
This had great potential written all over it. You had a pretty stellar cast (George Clooney, Matt Damon, Bill Murray AND John Goodman involved), a plot that sounded incredibly entertaining to watch, as if it could mix an old war movie from the 40s with a heist movie from the 50s, as well as it being based on a true story In the hands of Clooney, who HAS proven to be a capable director, and with a great cast and interesting story, I should have been entertained by the film. Not completely bored to tears by it. What happened? Perhaps it is the fact that Clooney had difficult finding the tone of light humor with the serious nature of the subject matter (rescuing pieces of art history in WWII before Adolf Hitler destroys them forever). Maybe it's the fact that it's a bit TOO rooted in its nostalgia. Whatever the reason, I came into The Monuments Men with pretty high expectations and came out of it feeling sorely disappointed. It feels like there could be potential for a great movie in there, the execution was just rather poorly executed.
#9. Need For Speed
Another year, another pointless attempt at adapting a video game into the feature film format....seriously, will we ever learn that these do not work? The latest attempt is an adaptation of EA's Need For Speed franchise. What's sad is I was actually HOPING for this to be good, mainly due to this being the first post Breaking Bad project for star Aaron Paul. Paul tries his best to rise above the material given to him, but his character of Tobey Marshall comes across as bland and almost a little too angry for his motivations. The plot itself is absolutely preposterous. While I understand this is nothing more than a mindlessly B movie, there is a fine line between entertainingly stupid (Fast and the Furious for example), and just....incredibly stupid, of which the movie falls into. I'm sorry, but how is Kid Cudi able to pull helicopters and tanks and all other vehicles out of his pocket like they are wrappers in the wind? And without getting in heaps of trouble for about two-thirds of the film? When I have to think of questions such as those in a movie where I shouldn't be thinking those questions, then we have a serious problem.
#8. The Amazing Spider Man 2
I am probably going to garner a lot of controversy for this next choice, but the fact of the matter is that this new Spider-Man movie was....pretty bad. The only things I can salvage are that Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone have fantastic chemistry and the effects were decent, the entire movie around them is god awful. The plot of this film suffers from the exact same problem that Spider-Man 3 suffered from: TMSGO, or Too Much Stuff Going On. The script is unnecessarily crowded. Why was Rhino in the film? To set up for the Sinister Six movie of course! Why did we need to see what happened to Peter's parents? Because we screwed you over last time and wanted to give you something that has NO impact on the story whatsoever! Why was Chris Cooper in this movie if he was going to DIE five seconds later? REASONS! Also, the villains in this movie were just terrible. I was really excited to see Jamie Foxx finally bring Electro into the Spider-Man film universe, but what Foxx gave us was a villain who flip flopped between good to evil within five seconds. He gets mad at Spidey....because Spidey was trying to help him? Oh-kay that's cool....I think. Also, Foxx utters some of the worst dialogue in the entire film, such as:
I would like to point out this happens during one of the film's better moments
Another problem I have is all the potential build up that the movie shoves forcefully down your throat in regards to their plans for an expanded Spidey Cinematic Universe. We get it, you are all really excited by your plans for a Sinister Six movie.....now stop shoving all of this in my face. Sony, just do us a favor.....give the rights back to Marvel Studios. Let them handle the character and see what they do with it. It would probably be less convoluted than this.
I know this might seem pretty pointless to put on this list, as the whole idea of this movie is...well to be dumb. But the thing about Dumb and Dumber To is that it tries and fails miserably to capture what made the original so fun in the first place. Jim Carrey, Jeff Daniels, and the Farrelly Brothers knew they were being idiots and they played along with it and had fun with it, which in turn allowed you to have fun as well. There was a certain charm to the 1994 original that still holds very well today. With this sequel, it feels as if they were much more mean-spirited this time around and trying in absolute vain to recapture the charm of the original film, making the whole film unpleasant and rather unfunny to watch. I laughed maybe once, but other times, I was trying to force a chuckle out. The story itself is basically the same as the first, making you realize throughout the film you could have just stayed home and watched the original. Dumb and Dumber To tries to be funny, but perhaps it has been 20 years too late.
#5. A Million Ways To Die In The West
I like Seth MacFarlane. The man can actually be genuinely funny at times. Sure, Family Guy has stumbled in recent years and sometimes the jokes can be....astonishingly crass and misogynistic. But the man is capable of making genuine humor, and that showed with his 2012 directorial debut, Ted. That film reminded me that Seth MacFarlane could still be very funny and was awaiting what he could do without the restrictions of television by having the landscape of comedy on film. Unfortunately, A Million Ways to Die in the West is the most disappointing and worst comedy I've seen all year. All the best jokes that the film had were spoiled in the film's trailer (seriously, why would you spoil the cameo from Christopher Lloyd as Doc Brown? That would've been an absolutely great reveal) and the other jokes, while some funny, you'll barely remember within 10 minutes of walking out of the theater. In regards to Seth MacFarlane....he just makes for a really unlikable male lead, as he spends most of the film literally listing off why the West is awful. The script is also a bit of a mess, as some of the jokes feel slapdashed together for the sake of needing a joke. It's a real shame because I know Seth MacFarlane HAS the ability to tell good humor, it just did not show here.
#4. Transcendence
Well, now that Christopher Nolan has introduced a wave of smart science fiction films for a new generation, we have people trying to follow in his footsteps. This brings us to Transcendence, the directorial debut of Nolan's longtime cinematographer Wally Pfister. With an idea involving Johnny Depp being uploaded as an artificial intelligence, this had numerous possibilities for being a sleek and thought provoking science fiction thriller. Unfortunately, the film's pace is so incredibly slow, dragging out its 119 minute run time. Not only that, but the plot holes in this film are huge, as most of the film's logic seems to make absolutely no sense (so....we're just going to upload his brain into a computer....without any sort of consequence....okay thanks Jack Palgen). The film's great cast is entirely wasted on this premise and while Pfister knows how to set up a beautiful shot, it can't save him from helping create one utter mess of a film.
#3. I, Frankenstein
Take a look at the image above. Go ahead, just take a look. Everything that is wrong with this movie is captured in this image. I, Frankenstein might be one of the most inane, idiotic movies I have ever had the misfortune of seeing. The idea to basically turn Mary Shelley's classic story into an Underworld knockoff (seriously....you're knocking off UNDERWORLD of all things) was an awful idea. The acting is terrible, the dialogue is awful, and the story....OK I'm going to veer into spoiler territory but this is a plot hole that is so big it basically negates the movie's existence so spoilers ahead:
So Aaron Eckhart is forced to kill Jai Courtney's gargoyle character near the end of the film, because he has no soul so he is able to kill both demon, and, if need be, gargoyle. The demon king Naberius (Bill Nighy) wants to use Adam as a vessel for a legion of demons, as Adam has no soul and therefore can be possessed like a human corpse. Naberius also plans to use Frankenstein's formula of creating Adam to make hundreds more like him. However, when Adam's body starts to become possessed, he rejects it and is still normal, stating that he has a soul. Now....correct me if I'm wrong....but he killed an angel just moments prior after being forced to.....I'm pretty sure you are not just GIVEN a soul and forcing to ascend an angel does not qualify as such. Also, he is human made not born like everyone else....pretty sure you also CAN'T grow a soul all on your own.....it's this kind of idiotic logic that pretty much negates this film's existence.
##2. The Legend of Hercules
Oh wow....wow was this film bad. What's even more shocking to realize is that this film was made on a budget of $70 million and looks like it was made on the budget of those Saturday night schlock fests you see on Syfy. Everything in this movie, from the costumes to the CGI to the action, looks incredibly cheap and fake and it is incredibly easy to tell how fake it looks. Also, the story is...bad. This focuses on how Hercules, before being told he is the son of Zeus, was a soldier, then betrayed, then becoming....Spartacus? The story isn't fun enough to keep yourself entertained nor is the drama in the story enough to keep you invested. Not only does this film look like it ripped heavily off of 300 if it was done on a shoestring budget, in terms of story and effects, but it also fails in the acting department. Kellan Lutz is an absolutely terrible choice for Hercules. He is bland, boring, uncharismatic, and speaks everyone of his lines as if he's reading for a middle school play. Do yourselves a favor: Skip this Hercules and see the far more superior and entertaining film starring Dwayne Johnson.
And the worst film of 2014 is....
#1. Transformers: Age of Extinction
I. F*****g. Hate. This. Movie. Everything about Transformers: Age of Extinction fails on every single level. Michael Bay has reached a new level of garbage that I did not even think was possible to reach. First off, the film is THREE HOURS. There are parts in this movie that could have been honestly cut out and made the film a lot more quicker. The scenes in Shanghai for example, are extremely unnecessary as we are just there to see new Transformers tech (and to give Bay an excuse to be blatantly racist to the Chinese). But honestly, even if you did cut a lot of this out, I don't think that would have even helped out as the acting and dialogue is some of the worst I've seen. Honestly, I feel bad for Mark Wahlberg and Stanley Tucci. They're both extremely good actors but they both are bogged down by the idiotic script and dialogue that are given to them. Tucci tries, he tries so very hard to escape it, but it's not helped by lines like "Death is on our tail, death is on our tail!"
The rest of the supporting cast does not fare well, with Nicola Peltz actually somehow being a worse actress than Megan Fox. Finally, we come to the action scenes, or rather, being bombarded with mindless explosions left and right. Now, I love action and I love seeing explosions as much as the next guy. Bay has proven to be an explosion master. However, what I don't like is having my mind bombarded with bright lights and explosions attacking my senses to the point where it's just numbing to look at. When the Dinobots, who you know are the main focus of the marketing material, show up almost TWO AND A HALF HOURS LATER, I should be excited, not praying to whatever movie gods are out there for this torture to just end already. Not only is Transformers: Age of Extinction the worst movie of 2014, but it is one of the worst movies I have ever seen period. It's lazy, unfocused, and an attack on how much your senses are able to withstand this much garbage. Somehow, it managed to reach a new level of crap I didn't even think existed.
Also, GOOD GOD BAY COULD YOU NOT BE ANY MORE SUBTLE WITH YOUR PRODUCT PLACEMENT??
So that was my 10 worst of 2014. These are the films I pray I will never have to watch again. Got any films you hated seeing that I forgot to mention? Disagree with some of my choices and want to discuss? Sound off in the comments below or follow me on Twitter @filmfan108!
Now, as we move away from the past and say goodbye to 2014, let us look ahead to the future, and see what 2015 has in store. Stay tuned for my 15 most anticipated films of 2015!
